The McGraw-Hill Companies
United States | Change Register | Log In
MY HOME PAGE
PRODUCTS & SERVICES
RESEARCH & KNOWLEDGE
ABOUT S&P
     

S&P Viewpoint

  Print this page

Request For Comment: S&P Will Not Implement Alternative Ratings Approach To Hybrid Capital Issues

Publication Date:    May 08, 2006 10:07 EST

S&P Will Not Implement Alternative Ratings Approach To Hybrid Capital Issues
Primary Credit Analyst:
Scott Sprinzen, New York (1) 212-438-7812;
scott_sprinzen@standardandpoors.com
Secondary Credit Analysts:
Scott Bugie, Paris (33) 1-4420-6680;
scott_bugie@standardandpoors.com
Emmanuel Dubois-Pelerin, Paris (33) 1-4420-6673;
emmanuel_dubois-pelerin@standardandpoors.com
Additional Contacts:
David Anthony, London (44) 20-7176-7010;
david_anthony@standardandpoors.com
Michelle Brennan, London (44) 20-7176-7205;
michelle_brennan@standardandpoors.com
Terry Chan, CFA, Melbourne (61) 3-9631-2174;
terry_chan@standardandpoors.com
Anthony Flintoff, Melbourne (61) 3-9631-2038;
anthony_flintoff@standardandpoors.com
Grace Osborne, New York (1) 212-438-7227;
grace_osborne@standardandpoors.com
Solomon B Samson, New York (1) 212-438-7653;
sol_samson@standardandpoors.com
Publication date: 08-May-06, 10:07:20 EST
Reprinted from RatingsDirect


NEW YORK (Standard & Poor's) May 8, 2006--On March 28, 2006, Standard & Poor's 
Ratings Services announced it was seeking comments regarding an alternative 
approach for determining hybrid capital issue ratings in those cases where we 
believe we can equate the pressure point where deferral could occur with a 
particular rating level. (See release, "S&P Requests Comments On Assigning 
Ratings To Hybrid Capital Issues.") This approach would take historical rating 
transition statistics as a guide in assessing the likelihood that there could 
be erosion in credit quality sufficient to jeopardize payments on the hybrid.
     Having received thoughtful comments from a broad range of market 
participants, we have decided not to implement the possible methodology at 
this time. We believe there would be only a relatively small number of cases 
where we could clearly equate the scenario where deferral would likely 
occur—whether due to the breach of triggers under a mandatory deferrable 
issue, actions on the part of a regulator to force a regulated entity to defer 
payments, or the decision by a company to exercise its right of optional 
deferral—with a specific rating level. Also, significant refinement of 
Standard & Poor's existing rating transition data would be necessary in order 
to serve as a satisfactory basis for such an approach. For example, one 
practical challenge in interpreting the transition data is that over an 
extended period of time, for a variety of reasons, a significant percentage of 
all ratings are withdrawn.
     For an overview of Standard & Poor's current methodology, see "Criteria: 
Assigning Ratings to Hybrid Capital Issues," published on May 8, 2006.
     Standard & Poor's is hosting a Hybrid Securities Hot Topics Conference on 
May 25, 2006, in New York. The conference will provide attendees with an 
overview of Standard & Poor's criteria for assessing and rating hybrid 
securities issued by corporate and financial services companies. For more 
information please log on to www.events.standardandpoors.com/hybrid.
     The report is available to subscribers of RatingsDirect, Standard & 
Poor's Web-based credit research and analysis system, at 
www.ratingsdirect.com. If you are not a RatingsDirect subscriber, you may 
purchase a copy of the report by calling (1) 212-438-9823 or sending an e-mail 
to research_request@standardandpoors.com. Ratings information can also be 
found on Standard & Poor's public Web site at www.standardandpoors.com; under 
Credit Ratings in the left navigation bar, select Find a Rating, then Credit 
Ratings Search. Members of the media may request a copy of this report by 
contacting the media representative provided.