Recovery Report: Oxbow Carbon and Minerals Holdings LLC's $960M Senior Secured Loan
|
| Publication Date: Apr 20, 2007 15:53 EST |
|
|
|
 | Recovery Report: Oxbow Carbon and Minerals Holdings LLC's $960M Senior Secured Loan | |
 | | | Publication date: 20-Apr-07, 15:53:12 EST | |
Reprinted from
RatingsDirect
|
|
|
 | |
|  | |  |
On April 20, 2007, Standard & Poor's assigned its 'B+" bank loan rating and '3' recovery rating to the proposed senior secured credit facility of
Oxbow Carbon and Minerals Holdings LLC (OCMH). The '3' recovery rating indicates the expectation of meaningful (50%-80%) recovery of principal in the event of a payment default, and the 'B+' bank loan rating is the same as the corporate credit rating. The ratings are based on preliminary terms and are subject to review of final documentation. As currently contemplated, the $960 million seven-year amortizing U.S. dollar-denominated Term Loan B facility will be available in three tranches:
-
$750 million at closing;
-
$125 million delayed draw (up to six months) to accommodate further acquisitions; and
-
$85 million delayed draw (up to six months) to facilitate the repurchase of outstanding senior unsecured notes that are not callable.
The borrower under the facilities will be Oxbow Carbon and Minerals Holdings LLC (OCMH), a subsidiary of Oxbow Carbon & Mineral Holdings Inc. (OCMH Inc.) OCMH is an intermediate holding company that owns Oxbow Carbon & Minerals LLC and Oxbow Mining LLC. The credit facility will be used by OCMH to acquire Great Lakes Carbon USA Inc. (GLC) and other expected acquisitions.
The credit facilities will be secured by a guaranty from all domestic subsidiaries and from all foreign subsidiaries to the extent that a guaranty does not create adverse tax consequences. In addition, each guarantor will provide a security interest in all existing and future real and personal property. In the event the GLC notes are not redeemed, a pro rata security interest may be extended to this debt as well.
The term loans will amortize 1% per annum until maturity. The credit facilities include an excess cash flow sweep beginning at 75% applied first to the term loan.
(For the corporate credit rating rationale on Oxbow Carbon and Minerals Holdings LLC, see Standard & Poor's report, "
Oxbow Carbon and Minerals Holdings LLC Corporate Credit, Bank Loan Rated 'B+'; Outlook Stable," published on April 20, 2007).
Table 1
|
Oxbow Carbon and Minerals Holdings LLC - Credit Profile
|
|
Corporate credit rating
|
B+/Stable/--
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility/Issue
|
Issue rating
|
Recovery rating
|
Expected recovery (%)
|
Term (years)
|
Repayment
|
|
$960M secured Term Loan B
|
B+
|
3
|
50-80
|
7
|
1% per year with repayment at maturity
|
Recovery Analysis |
Table 2
|
Oxbow Carbon and Minerals Holdings LLC--Simulated Default/Valuation Variables
|
|
--Simulated Default--
|
|
--Valuation--
|
|
--Results--
|
|
Years to default
|
4 (2010)
|
|
EBITDA multiple
|
6.7x
|
|
Unadjusted value
|
$865.3M
|
|
LIBOR rise
|
150 bps
|
|
Risk Free Rate
|
6.8%
|
|
Priority claims
|
$43.3M
|
|
LIBOR margin increase
|
150 bps
|
|
Weighted avg cost of capital
|
8.6%
|
|
Adjusted value
|
$822.1M
|
| |
|
|
Industry Beta
|
1.43x
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue stress
|
+5.0% (2007), 3.0% (2008), 1.0% (2009), -5.0% (2010), +2% thereafter
|
|
Effective tax
|
30%
|
|
Estimated principal recovery--Sr Secured
|
50%-80%
|
|
Cost of goods sold stress
|
+100 bps (2007-2009), +130 bps (2010),
|
|
Equity risk premium
|
10%
|
|
|
|
|
SG&A stress
|
-10 bps (2007), +30 bps (2010),
|
|
Cost of debt
|
6.8%
|
|
|
|
|
Maintenance capex
|
$20M
|
|
Capital structure
|
70%/30%
|
|
|
|
|
Default bank debt
|
$1.05B
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Default EBITDA
|
$88.8M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Default unlevered free cash flow
|
$67.7M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Simulated default scenario|
Oxbow Carbon & Minerals LLC, a subsidiary, is currently the leader in the global petroleum coke market. With the acquisition of GLC, OCMH will expand its presence in the calcined petroleum coke market. These commodity products are primary inputs in industrial production. Standard & Poor's default scenario assumes a modest decline in industrial activity that affects sales growth beginning in 2007; increased competition from new producers of petroleum coke and calcined coke products, resulting in lower margins and customer loss in 2010; and rising interest rates throughout this period. This scenario results in an OCMH bankruptcy in 2010.
-
Revenue increases 5% in fiscal year 2007 on a pro forma year-over-year basis, followed by a 3% increase in fiscal 2008, a 1% increase in 2009, and a 5% decline in fiscal 2010;
-
Costs of goods sold increases by 100 bps per annum through 2009 and 130 bps in 2010;
-
Selling, general, and administrative expense improves 10 bps in 2007 and then increases by 30 bps in 2010;
-
CAPEX declines to $20 million in fiscal 2010;
-
LIBOR increases 150 bps from fiscal 2007 to fiscal 2010;
-
Cost of capital increases of 150 bps on the revolving credit facility only because of the borrower's declining performance;
-
Revolving facility availability to fund cash flow shortfalls is limited by the borrower's letter of credit requirement that increase to $85 million in fiscal 2010 from $70 million in fiscal 2007, while deteriorating fundamentals preclude the permitted expansion of the revolving credit facility; and
-
The acquisitions are assumed to be completed mid-2007 and the GLC notes previously outstanding are assumed to share pro rata in the collateral package if not refunded under the delayed take-down Term Loan B facility.
Our simulated default scenario results in the following:
-
A payment default in fiscal 2010;
-
Revenue drops to $3.17 billion in fiscal 2010, 3.8% above pro forma combined fiscal 2006 actual revenue of $3.06 billion;
-
EBITDA declines to $89 million in fiscal 2010, 59% below pro forma combined fiscal 2006 EBITDA of $216 million; and
-
EBITDA margins decline 430 bps to 2.8% in fiscal 2010 versus 7.1% pro forma combined fiscal 2006.
|
Valuation|
Standard & Poor's believes that if the borrower were to experience a payment default, it would continue to have a viable business model driven by continued demand for its coal, pet coke, and calcined coke products. Therefore, we believe that lenders would achieve greatest recovery value through reorganization of the borrower rather than through liquidation.
Furthermore, considering the commodity nature of the business and its exposure to macroeconomic factors, emergence from bankruptcy would involve a valuation based on projected cash flow as the borrower emerges and attendant volume and pricing levels improve. Therefore, we based the borrower's valuation on its free cash flow in fiscal 2011, the year following default. Revenue in 2011 is assumed to grow a modest 2% and costs of goods as a percentage of sales improve to 91.7%. Capital expenditure reverts to management's forecast. These assumptions yield emergence EBITDA of $129 million and un-levered cash flow (defined as EBITDA less capital expenditure and working capital changes) of $87 million. Additional components of our valuation are:
-
Perpetual growth rate of 1%;
-
Weighted average cost of capital of approximately 11.1% assuming a reorganized company financed with 70% debt and 30% equity at the tax adjusted cost of debt of 6.8%;
-
Unleveraged beta of 1.43 based on Ibbotson's beta data for this sector; and
-
Administrative expenses of approximately 5% of enterprise value representing professional fees and costs of bankruptcy that may be outstanding at the time of recovery.
|
Results|
These discounted cash flow assumptions yield enterprise value of approximately $865 million, which equates to a multiple of 6.7x simulated emergence EBITDA of $129 million. This is comparable with recent transaction multiples in this sector. At default, we project that there would be approximately $1.05 billion of senior secured bank debt outstanding. This assumes a fully drawn revolving credit facility, including the projected amount of peak revolving facility borrowings. After deducting about $43 million of administrative expenses, remaining enterprise value totals $822 million; however, because of the foreign stock pledge exclusion, $58 million of value must be shared with other unsecured senior lenders. Therefore, we estimate 50% to 80% recovery on the new senior secured credit facilities, which equates to a recovery rating of '3' and a bank loan rating of 'B+', equivalent to the corporate credit rating.
|
Table 3
|
|
|
Transaction Summary
|
Senior secured facilities
|
|
Borrower
|
Oxbow Carbon and Minerals Holdings LLC
|
|
Guarantors
|
All domestic and foreign direct and indirect subsidiaries
|
|
Structure
|
For the term loan 1% annually, balance due at maturity.
|
|
Security package
|
Secured by a perfected first-priority security interest in substantially all the borrower's and each guarantor's tangible and intangible assets, including the capital stock of the borrower and each of its direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries and 65% of the capital stock of foreign subsidiaries. Collateral may exclude certain assets of Great Lakes Carbon USA that cannot be pledged without the consent of one or more third parties.
|
|
Legal jurisdiction/issues
|
State of New York
|
|
Key Covenants
|
None
|
|
|
 |
|
Analytic services provided by Standard & Poor's Ratings Services (Ratings Services) are the result of separate activities designed to preserve the independence and objectivity of ratings opinions. The credit ratings and observations contained herein are solely statements of opinion and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or make any other investment decisions. Accordingly, any user of the information contained herein should not rely on any credit rating or other opinion contained herein in making any investment decision. Ratings are based on information received by Ratings Services. Other divisions of Standard & Poor's may have information that is not available to Ratings Services. Standard & Poor's has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of non-public information received during the ratings process.
Ratings Services receives compensation for its ratings. Such compensation is normally paid either by the issuers of such securities or third parties participating in marketing the securities. While Standard & Poor's reserves the right to disseminate the rating, it receives no payment for doing so, except for subscriptions to its publications. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|